The Aaron Papers www.the-aaron-papers.net
|
||
| Home
Feedback
|
||
|
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem (It
will be helpful for us to understand that Jerusalem has always been the
most visible epicenter of the world’s religions. So then by following
the history of Jerusalem, we may receive important insights into the
historic relationships of the three major religions—Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam.) History of Jerusalem (Encarta
96 Encyclopedia) "The
site of Jerusalem was occupied during the Stone Age; the aboriginal
inhabitants were driven out in the period 5000 BC to 4000 BC by a people
called in the Old Testament the Canaanites, who had advanced into the
Bronze Age. The invaders, a mixed people among whom the Jebusites were
dominant, came under Egyptian rule in the 15th century BC, during the
conquests of King Thutmose III." "Then,
in about 1250 BC, the Hebrews began their conquest of Canaan, initially
under their leader Joshua. So powerfully fortified was Jerusalem, however,
that it did not fall until more than 200 years later, when David finally
captured it some years after being anointed king of Israel (see 2 Samuel
5:6-9; 1 Chronicles 11:4-7)." (At
this very early point in Israel’s history, there already existed a great
enmity between Israel and these coastal peoples. There is more than ample
Old Testament documentation concerning this ongoing ethnic struggle
between Israel and her neighbors.) Holy City of the Jews "According
to the Old Testament, David decided to make Jerusalem his residence and
the capital of his country. The new king brought the Ark of Jehovah to his
capital from its obscurity at Qiryat Ye'crim (a holy place of the time,
west of Jerusalem) and installed it in a new tabernacle (see 2 Samuel
6:1-17), built a royal palace and many other buildings, and strengthened
the city's fortifications. David's son and successor, Solomon, continued
the development of Jerusalem. He built a city wall and many buildings on a
scale of magnificence previously unknown to Israel. Solomon's principal
buildings were the Temple and a new royal palace, encircled by a wall. The
palace, built on successive terraces, consisted of a house (constructed of
cedar beams and pillars brought from the forests of Lebanon) that was
about 28 m (92 ft) wide, 55 m (180 ft) long, and 17 m (56 ft) high; the
throne hall; the palace proper, or royal apartments; and the prison (see 1
Kings 5-7; Nehemiah 3:25-27; Jeremiah 32:2). The courts and buildings of
the Temple were constructed on a level above the palace. The main building
of the Temple was considered of great beauty, but was comparatively small,
being only 20 cubits wide and 60 cubits long (about 11 m wide and 33 m
long), exclusive of the porch and the side chambers. The Temple was built
of cedar and stone (see 1 Kings 6:3-6) and was surrounded by a court that
contained the altar of burnt offerings and a "molten sea," or
bronze water tank (see 1 Kings 7:9-12, 23-47)." "Jerusalem
continued to expand after Solomon's reign until the ten northern tribes of
Israel seceded from the rule of the house of David, after which the
importance of the city, now the capital of two tribes, Judah and Benjamin,
diminished greatly. Jerusalem was wracked for the next two centuries by
costly sieges, incursions, and unsuccessful military undertakings. Not
until the reigns of King Uzziah of Judah (reigned 783-742 BC) and his son
Jotham (reigned 742-735 BC) did the city begin to regain its previous
status (2 Chronicles 26, 27). Between this period and the rise of the
powerful Maccabee family, about six centuries later, the history of
Jerusalem is that of the Jews. Under the Maccabees, Jerusalem entered upon
an era of unprecedented prosperity. It became the holy city of Judaism and
the great pilgrim shrine of the Jewish world." Roman Occupation "Conquest
by the Romans under the general and statesman Pompey the Great in 63 BC
resulted in no serious material disaster to the city. Its greatest
prosperity was attained under Herod the Great. Besides a complete
reconstruction of the Temple on a scale that was truly magnificent,
involving the expenditure of vast sums of money, he undertook the building
of the Xystus, an open place surrounded by a gallery; his own great
palace, on the western side of the city; and a hippodrome, theater, and
large reservoir. In addition to these works, minor improvements were made,
including the general strengthening of the city's fortifications. Less
than a century later, however, during a Jewish rebellion against Roman
authority, Titus, son of the Roman emperor Vespasian, captured and razed
the city in AD 70; only a few remnants of the western fortifications
remained. With this calamity, the history of ancient Jerusalem came to an
end." "The
Roman emperor Hadrian visited the city, which was largely in ruins, about
AD 130, and began its reconstruction. The rebellion of the Jews, led by
Simon Bar Kokhba, against the Romans between the years 132 and 135 led the
emperor to make the new city a pagan one and to prohibit all Jews from
entering it. The new city was called Aelia Capitolina. The wall which
encircled it was, in general, on the line of the old wall, except on the
south, where it excluded a large portion of the former city." A Christian City "Little
is known of the city from the time of Hadrian to that of the Roman emperor
Constantine the Great, (Edict of Milan AD 313) when Christianity became
the religion of the empire. The population of Jerusalem was gradually
supplemented by Christians, and pilgrims flocked to the city. The Church
of the Holy Sepulcher was built at the order of Emperor Constantine the
Great. Other buildings of like character were subsequently constructed,
and Jerusalem became a Christian city. Among the noteworthy buildings
belonging to this period are the Church of Saint Stephen, north of the
city, built by the Byzantine empress Eudocia, who also rebuilt the ancient
southern wall; and the great Church of Saint Mary on the Temple hill,
which was built by the Byzantine emperor Justinian I. The
Christian city, after being captured by the Persians under King Khosrau II
in 614, but recovered by the Byzantine emperor Heraclius in 628, was taken
in 637 by the Muslims under the caliph Umar I (see
Caliphate)." ("THE
GREAT EVENTS by Famous Historians"—The National Alumni—1902. The
Muslim conquest of Jerusalem—After a siege of four months Jerusalem
capitulated, her defenders having no rest from the ceaseless assaults of
the besiegers. Hard work still lay before the Saracens in Syria; but after
the reduction of Aleppo, which cost several months’ siege, with great
loss of lives to the invaders, they passed on to Antioch and other
strongholds, until, one by one, all had been subdued; the surrender of
Caesarea completing the great conquest and the subjection of Syria to the
rule of the Caliph." P.248 In
the Saracen’s conquest of Syria, we visit the end of one of their battle
so as to gain some insight into these peoples—The Saracens cut off all
their heads, then flayed them, and so carried them upon the points of
their lances, presenting a most horrible spectacle to all that part of the
country,.." p.253 It
would appear that the Muslim’s violent tactics, like the other
conquering armies of that early period in history, were intended to
generate great fear among the local populations. This would fit nicely
with the sword in one hand and the Qur’an in the other hand doctrine for
advancing the Islamic religion. From the very beginning in the seventh
century, Islam has been a religion of
physical conquest.) "A shrine, the Dome of the Rock, was erected over the rock believed to be the altar place of Solomon's Temple." "The
Christians were treated leniently by their Muslim conquerors, but when the
Egyptian Fatimid caliphs became the rulers of Jerusalem, in 969, the
situation became more precarious." "The
Seljuk Turks conquered the city in 1071, and their maltreatment of
Christians and destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher were among
the causes of the Crusades." (Some
of my thoughts on the Christian Crusades— After
long and careful consideration, one would be hard pressed to believe that
Jerusalem was ever supposed to be a Christian city. So for the consolation
of the Christian Church, we offer Galatians 2: "25Now this
Ha-gar is mount Si-nai in Arabia and answers to the Jerusalem that now
is: for she is in bondage with her children." So then from this
clear instruction, the vision for the Christian Church should be a
heavenly vision of freedom and not an earthly vision of bondage. Nor
would one find Jesus at the front of this crusading army that came so far
to violently recapture Jerusalem from the Muslims. We then find that these
crusading armies were also guilty of the same atrocities, as those of the
Saracen’s in their conquest of Syria some 462 years earlier. Though
one can understand the perceived religious significance that Christians
find in the historic Jerusalem, one must also believe that their
perception in this case is greatly misdirected. Once again, they should
have remembered what Christ had previously told them—That His kingdom
was not of this world. That single principle in itself should have
deterred the Christian effort towards the establishment of any earthly
rule. But we must also believe that as long as we humans are here on this
earth, that as misguided as our efforts might be, we will probably
continue to establish earthly ways and objects in our efforts to worship
our Creator God.) Consequently—In
1099 the Crusaders, under the French nobleman Godfrey of Bouillon, gained
possession of the city and slaughtered many of its inhabitants. Jerusalem
again became a Christian city and the capital of the so-called Latin
Kingdom (see Jerusalem, Latin
Kingdom of), until its capture in 1187 by the Muslim leader Saladin [that]
all but ended Christian rule." Later History "From
the 13th century, when Jerusalem was captured by the Egyptian Mamelukes,
through Ottoman rule, begun in 1517, the city's importance declined.
During these centuries, however, many Jews, fleeing persecution in Europe,
returned to Jerusalem; by the late 19th century they had become a majority
of the population. The
city was taken by British forces in 1917, and from 1922 to 1948 it formed
part of the British mandate of Palestine. After
the creation of the state of Israel in 1948, Jerusalem was the site of
some of the most bitter fighting between the Jews and the Arabs. The
United Nations General Assembly, in its original partition plan of
November 29, 1947, proposed to establish Jerusalem and its environs as an
international enclave. The objective was to ensure free access for all
religious groups to the holy places of the city. In
the spring of 1948, however, the opposing armies of Israel and Jordan
seized Jerusalem; Israel occupied the western portion of the city,
containing the modern residential and business sections, and Jordan
occupied the eastern portion, including the Old City. In addition, the
Israeli forces held a corridor to Jerusalem extending from Tel Aviv-Jaffa
on the coast. In the armistice signed on April 3, 1949 between Israel and
Jordan, both sides recognized the other's holdings in Jerusalem. In
1950 the New City was made the capital of Israel. During
the Six-Day War of June 1967, Israeli forces captured the Old City, and
the Israeli Knesset unilaterally decreed the reunification of the entire
city. This was reiterated by the Knesset in 1980, when the undivided city
was declared the eternal capital of Israel. Social
cleavages between Israelis and Arabs persisted in the unified city of
Jerusalem, and neighborhoods were constructed with buffers separating
members of the two groups. By 1990 West Jerusalem was exclusively Jewish,
and the population of East Jerusalem was evenly divided between Arabs and
Jews. While Jewish sections of the city have been the target of
government-supported development efforts, Arab areas have been largely
neglected. Jerusalem
remained a disputed city into the 1990s, with Israel claiming authority
over the city as a whole, and the Palestinians demanding the return of
East Jerusalem, including the Old City and its holy sites. In September
1993, a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation
Organization called for a negotiated settlement on the future political
status of Jerusalem. Due to its centrality and sensitivity, however, the
topic of Jerusalem was largely set aside as negotiations on implementation
of the peace accord continued throughout 1994 and early 1995." (Then
moving on into the 21st century, and understanding today’s
political environment in the Middle East—especially Jerusalem, one could
conclude that these "negotiations on implementation of the peace
accord" have made little or no progress since the 1990s. Matter of
fact, one might even say that the conditions in the Middle East have
degraded considerably. It
would be very shortsighted on our part, to approach this difficult Middle
East situation from the perspective of only its immediate problematic
circumstances. That is, what you would be trying to do, is to resolve a
problem that has a history of more than three millennia with a
twenty-first century mentality. One could agree that the world can
probably mandate the "negotiations on implementation of the peace
accord" for this Middle East problem, but one cannot believe that
their mandated peace accord can remove the enmity—the mutual hatred that
has long exists between the Jews and the Arabs. Because it is this mutual
hatred on both sides [especially that of the radical extremist groups]
that has always fueled this continuing conflict. If
we ever hope to reach a lasting solution for this spiritually important
region, the west as a moderator must seek out the counsel of the more
moderate voices in the Middle East. Voices like King Abdullah of Jordan
and Egypt’s President Mubarak: Two very important Islamic leaders, who
appear to have overcome that historic enmity that has for millennia
divided the Jews and the Arabs. Then
in one’s humble opinion, the Christian Church is essentially a
non-player in these Middle East difficulties. Their only valuable
contribution might be to help as a moderator in any negotiated peace
process—as they appear to be doing. Though
this problem between the Jews and the Arabs is primarily seen as a
cultural problem that is in need of a political solution, one needs to
understand that there are some serious religious overtones that do
exacerbate this longstanding enmity—and thus hindering the present peace
process. May
God’s peace work within each of us to circumvent our natural enmity? And
pray for the peace of Jerusalem. Sincerely Aaron |
||
| Home Top Feedback | ||
| Website by ATC Free Site. Webmaster Jackson Snyder (Jack AT Glowmi.org). All text copyright © 2005 Aaron Randall. All rights reserved. Photos, unless otherwise credited, are the property of the auth, all rights reserved. Originally posted February 24, 2004. Revised: March 09, 2006. |