|
PART FOUR
AN EXPOSITION OF THE
ESCHATOLOGY OF ROMANS
THE ISRAEL OF GOD
THE EVERLASTING COVENANT
*-Section 4 - THE EVERLASTING COVENANT AND US - JEWS AND GENTILES
-THE EVERLASTING COVENANT
PREFACE-
AARON-To understand what the
Christian Church represents in this Dispensation of Grace, it is
necessary that we first understand Abraham's relationship with God
and exactly what that relationship established. The Scriptures tell
us “Abraham believed God and it was accounted unto him for
righteousness” (Gen.15:6 /Rom.4:3), which is precisely the same
qualifications that are now required for the present day Christian:
For salvation is only by God’s free and unmerited grace through
Christ’s faith. Through Abraham's covenant relationship with God,
the institution of the Christian Church has also received access to
that same Abrahamic Covenant of Grace: A complex covenant that
always included the invisible Covenant of Promise. The formation of
the Christian Church is the exact fulfillment of God's original
promise to Abraham—“In your seed (Jesus) shall all the nations of
the earth be blessed.” (Ref.Gen.12:3; 17:4; 22:18; 26:4; Gal.3:16).
Then it is also confirmed in
Gal.3:8 and 1Cor.2:7-10, that the Christian era is in fact the
prophetic fulfillment of this same promise to Abraham:
“The Scriptures
foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith,
preached the gospel beforehand unto Abraham, saying, in you
shall all the nations be blessed.”
“A mystery that has
been hidden, which God foreordained before the worlds unto
our glory.” (We of the Church.)
Now those who would argue
against this covenant point—suggesting that the Church age was not
foretold in the Old Testament, need go no further than these
revealing Scriptures. The ultimate justification of the Gentiles
was the original reason for establishing the Everlasting Covenant.
Remember that Abraham was originally a Gentile.
Then Gal.3:16-18 tells us
that the Old Covenant—the law form Mount Sinai, came four hundred
and thirty years after the Covenant that God made with Abraham; the
visible Covenant of Grace /with the invisible Covenant of Promise.
And that, the Old Covenant Law does not annul, so as to make the
promise of no effect. For if the inheritance is of the law, it is
no more of promise: But God has granted it to Abraham by promise.
“For not through the law was the promise to Abraham, but through the
righteousness of faith.” “For if they that are of the law are
heirs, faith is made void and the promise is made ineffective.”
(Rom.4:13 and 14) “For by the works of the law shall no flesh be
justified in God's sight.” (Rom.3:20a) God’s righteous grace is
conveyed to us through the justifying faith that we initially
receive from God—Exclusive of any and all works or legal merit. <*>
The Scriptures further tell
us that Abraham received only the sign of Circumcision at the time
when God formally established His Everlasting Covenant. Which was,
in all actuality, a visible representation pointing back to his
invisible Circumcision—the invisible seal of the righteousness of
the faith that Abraham had received from God while he was still in
Uncircumcision—while he was still a Gentile in every sense of the
word. “That he (Abraham) might be the father of all them that
believe: though they be in Uncircumcision, that righteousness might
be accounted unto them.” (Rom.4:11) “To the end, that the promise
may be sure to all the seed: Not to that only which is of the law
(visible Israel), but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham,
who is the father of us all.” (Rom.4:16) “Now it was not
written for Abraham's sake alone, that it was accounted unto him,
but for our sake (we of the Church) also, unto whom it shall be
accounted.” (Rom.4:23 and 24) “Now we (of the invisible
Congregation) brethren, as Isaac was, are children of the promise.”
(Gal.4:28) “And if you are Christ's, then are you Abraham's seed,
heirs according to the promise.” (Gal.3:29) “And we of the Church
have strong encouragement, who have fled for refuge to lay hold of
the hope set before us: Which we have as an anchor of our soul. A
hope both sure and steadfast and entering into that which is within
the veil.” (Heb.6:18,19)
Romans chapter four
explains and confirms God's initial intent concerning Abraham’s
Covenants with God and Jesus' Church.
SOME BACKGROUND:
"This chapter, as TURRETTIN
observes, divides itself into three parts. The first from 1 to 12
inclusive; the second from 13 to 17 inclusive, in which it is proved
that the PROMISE made to Abraham did not depend on the law; and the
third from 18 to the end, in which the faith of Abraham is
commended, and the Christian faith briefly referred to.
But PAREUS makes a different
division: 1, Four proofs of justification by faith, from 1 to 16; 2,
The dispensation of Abraham from 17 to 22; 3, The application of the
subject, from 23 to 25.-Ed."
Calvin's Commentary – Romans
- pp.152, 153 footnote 1
“What then shall we say that
Abraham, our forefather, has found according to the flesh? For if
Abraham was justified by works, he has somewhat to glory in, but not
toward God.”
1. "According to the
flesh... But I think that it was expressed as a thing peculiar to
the Jews; for it was a great honor to be the children of Abraham by
nature of descent, then by mere adoption, provided there was also
faith. He then concedes to the Jews a closer bond of union, but
only for this end—that he might more deeply impress them that they
ought not to depart from the example of their father."
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- p.154
“For what do the Scriptures
say? And Abraham believed God, and it was accounted unto him for
righteousness. Now to him that works, the reward is not accounted
as of grace, but as of debt.”
"The foregoing observation
contains a lucid and a satisfactory view of the character of
Abraham's faith, perfectly consistent with what is said of it by
Paul in this chapter, and in the epistle to the Galatians. Some
think that the principle of faith was the only thing which the
Apostle had in view in referring to Abraham's faith, and that he had
no special regard to the object of justifying faith, that is,
Christ. But that Christ was, in a measure, revealed to him, is
evident from the account given in Genesis, and from what Christ
Himself has said, - that Abraham saw His day and rejoiced, Jn.8:56.
At the same time it was the PROMISE of gratuitous mercy, as CALVIN
(announces), that formed the most distinctive object of Abraham's
faith, the PROMISE of a free acceptance, without any regard to
works.
There are two things which
the Apostle clearly intends to show,
(1)-that imputation of
righteousness is an act of gratuitous favor,
(2)- and that it is alone by
faith. <*>
There is some difference in
the wording, though not in the meaning, of the sentence from
Gen.15:6. Paul gives it literally according to the Septuagint. The
word `Abraham,' is put in; instead of `Jehovah,' it is `God;' the
verb `count,' is made passive, and a preposition is placed before
`righteousness.' The Hebrew is this, - `and he believed on Jehovah,
and He counted it to him righteousness.' The `it,' no doubt, refers
to what is included in the word `believe.' So Paul explains it in
v.9, where he expressly puts down (pistis), faith.
It has been said that this
faith of Abraham was not faith in Christ, according to what the
context shows in Genesis. And it was not so specifically: nor does
Paul represent it as such; for this was not his object. He states
it throughout as faith in God; it was believing
the testimony of God; but that testimony embraced a
PROMISE respecting Christ; so that it included the
Saviour within its compass. We must remember that Paul's
object is to establish this truth, - that righteousness is attained
by faith and not by works; and that for this end he adduces
(presents) the examples both of Abraham and David. It was not his
design to point out specifically the object of justifying faith. We
must keep this in view, in order to understand the reasoning of the
Apostle in this chapter: it is the power and efficacy of faith, in
opposition to all works, that he particularly dwells upon, and the
gracious PROMISE of God was its object."
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.156, 157 footnote 1
aaron-We must
remember that it is God who initially gives all of us the FAITH
necessary to believe in Him and then to receive His gracious
righteousness as our very own. The contrast between works and faith
is a bit more difficult to precisely explain. I do not believe that
the Apostle places the “efficacy of faith, in opposition to all
works”, as our works for the Kingdom are the visible evidence of our
progress towards our sanctification.
“But to him that works not,
but believes on Him that justifies the ungodly, his faith is
accounted for righteousness. Even David pronounced blessing upon
the man unto whom the Lord accounted righteousness apart from
works. Saying: Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and
whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will
not account sin. Is this blessing then pronounced upon the
Circumcision, or upon the Uncircumcision also? For we say, to
Abraham, his faith was accounted for righteousness.
"This `only' is not in the
original, but is supplied by most commentators: yet it is not
necessary, nor makes the meaning consistent with what follows in v.
10. The (Kai) in the next clause is omitted in many copies;
but if retained, it will not alter the sense. We may render this
part of the verse thus, `Come then this blessedness on the
Circumcision, or even on the Uncircumcision?' Then in the
tenth verse he answers in the negative, - that it was not to Abraham
while `in Circumcision,' but while he was `in Uncircumcision.' The
reference is evidently to the first state of things, to the case of
Abraham himself. Abraham is supposed to have been justified by
faith about fourteen years before he was circumcised."
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.162, 163 footnote 1
aaron-It must be observed by
the language of these passages, that God is detailing His eternal
commitment to the complete incorporation of the uncircumcision into
His Abrahamic Covenant of Grace: Which contains both the
Circumcision of the Flesh Covenant—the Covenant of Bondage, and the
hidden Covenant of Promise. It is imperative that we grasp these
specific truths that God has revealed here in the book of Romans.
"As Circumcision and
Uncircumcision are alone mentioned, some unwisely conclude, that the
only question is that righteousness is not attained by the
ceremonies of the law. But we ought to consider what sort of men
were those with whom Paul was reasoning; for we know that
hypocrites, whilst they generally boast of meritorious works, do yet
disguise themselves in outward masks. The Jews also had a peculiar
way of their own, by which they departed, through a gross abuse of
the law, from true and genuine righteousness. Paul had said, that
no one is blessed but he whom God reconciles to Himself by a
gratuitous pardon; it hence follows, that all are accursed, whose
works come to judgment.”
aaron-See Rev.14:13;
Jas.2:14-26; Rom.14:10; and 2Cor.5:10, as a rebuttal to “all are
accursed, whose works come to judgment”. It is clear in his
comments that John Calvin is referring to the principal “by the
works of the Law shall no flesh be justified in His sight”. Which
is surly true with respect to all salvation throughout all time,
because all are saved by God’s grace through the finished
propitiatory work of Christ on the cross—Jews and non-Jews alike.
Ref.Rom.3:21-26 <**>
“Now then this principle is
to be held, that men are justified, not by their own worthiness, but
by the mercy of God. But still, this is not enough, except
remission of sins precedes all works, and of these the first was
Circumcision, (?) which initiated the Jewish people into the service
of God. He therefore proceeds to demonstrate this also. We must
ever bear in mind, that Circumcision is here mentioned as the
initial works, so to speak, of the righteousness of the law: for the
Jews gloried not in it as the symbol of God's favor, but as a
meritorious observance of the law: and on this account it was that
they regarded themselves better than others, as though they
possessed a higher excellency before God. We now see that the
dispute is not about one rite; that is, every work to which reward
can be due. * Circumcision then was especially mentioned, because it
(??) was the basis of the righteousness of the law. But Paul
maintains the contrary, and thus reasons: "If Abraham's
righteousness was the remission of sins, (which he safely takes as
granted,) and if Abraham attained this before Circumcision, it then
follows that remission of sins is not given for preceding merits."
You see that the argument rests on the order of cause and effect;
for the cause is always before its effect; and righteousness was
possessed by Abraham before he had Circumcision."
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.163, 164
aaron-(?) John Calvin made
this statement—“Circumcision, which initiated the Jewish people into
the service of God”, which is partially correct. But the reality of
the visible Circumcision of the Flesh Covenant—the Covenant of
Bondage, was God’s institutional commanded visible initiatory rite
for their initial membership into the visible side of the Abrahamic
Covenant of Grace.
(??) So we must keep the
eyes of our understanding fixed on the fact that visible
circumcision was the commanded visible initiatory rite into the
Abrahamic Covenant of Grace. The initial visible symbol that would
ultimately manifest the invisible Circumcision to our understanding
as well—the Circumcision of the Heart. I am convinced beyond any
doubt whatsoever, that Abraham actually received his invisible
Circumcision at the precise moment that he received God’s gracious
righteousness through the Spirit of Regeneration. That is, at his
first encounter with God, Abraham received that blessed Circumcision
of the Heart.
“How then was it accounted?
When he was in Circumcision, or in Uncircumcision? Not in
Circumcision but in Uncircumcision. And (*$$) he received the
sign of Circumcision; a seal of the righteousness of the faith
which he had while he was in Uncircumcision. That he might be the
father of ALL THEM THAT BELIEVE, though they be in
Uncircumcision, that righteousness might be accounted unto them:
And the father of (the) Circumcision to them who not only are the
Circumcision, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our
father Abraham which he had in Uncircumcision.” (Rom.4:1-12)
aaron-It must be observed
here that Abraham received the “seal of the righteousness of the
faith” from God—Which is the Circumcision of the heart,
approximately fourteen years before he received “the sign”—his
physical circumcision of the flesh. <*>
"In order to anticipate an
objection, he shows that Circumcision was (*a) not unprofitable and
superfluous, though it could not justify; but it had another very
remarkable use, it had the office of sealing, and as it were of
ratifying the righteousness of faith. And yet he (announces) at the
same time, by stating what its object was, that it was not the cause
of righteousness, it indeed tended to confirm the righteousness of
faith, and that already obtained in Uncircumcision. He then
derogates or takes away nothing from it. We have indeed here a
remarkable passage with regard to the general (**) benefits of
sacraments.”
(*a)aaron-This
dialogue concerning Circumcision is like dancing on the head of a
pin. To clarify this matter, we must first understand that the
visible circumcision of the flesh was not the SEAL! Besides being
the visible initiatory rite for membership in the Abrahamic
Covenant, the visible circumcision of the flesh was the visible SIGN
that was manifested to give us some understanding of God’s hidden
invisible SEAL.
(**)Did John
Calvin really recognize some “general benefits of sacraments”?
Because of the confusion over the complex characteristics of
sacraments, I seriously doubt that he ever allocated any real
efficacy to the visible initiatory rites of Circumcision and
Baptism.
($)“According to the
testimony of Paul, they are seals by which the PROMISES of God are
in a manner imprinted on our hearts, and the certainty of grace
confirmed. And though by themselves (?) they profit nothing, yet God
has designed them to be the instruments of His grace; and HE
EFFECTS BY THE SECRET GRACE OF HIS SPIRIT, that they should not
be without benefit in the elect. And though they are dead and
unprofitable symbols to the reprobate, they yet ever retain their
import and character: for though our unbelief may deprive them of
their effect, yet it cannot weaken or extinguish the truth of God.
Hence it remains a fixed principle, that sacred symbols are
testimonies, by which God seals His grace on our hearts. (**)As to
the symbol of Circumcision, this especially is to be said, that a
TWOFOLD GRACE was represented by it. God had PROMISED to Abraham a
blessed SEED, from whom salvation was to be expected by the whole
world. On this depended the PROMISE -"I will be to thee a God."
(Gen.17:7) Then a gratuitous reconciliation with God was included
in that symbol: and for this reason it was necessary that the
faithful should look forward to the PROMISED SEED.”
($)aaron-John
Calvin rightly defines the efficacy of the visible sacraments as
having a sealing quality—imprinting God’s grace upon our hearts.
(?)But Calvin immediately devalues the visible sacraments by
stating—“by themselves they profit nothing”. Now this may be true
from the human perspective, but not where God is involved in the
reconciliation process. This error is simply the common sense
conclusion that has been reached by many. I would also add, that
this erroneous conclusion has nearly wrecked the whole of their
theology. The base problem comes from the fact that most of these
theologians see the distribution of God’s grace as going only to the
elect—the invisible elect priesthood.
(**)But then Calvin
writes—“As to the symbol of Circumcision, this especially is to be
said, that a TWOFOLD GRACE was represented by it.” Now this
statement is correct in every respect—the gracious visible
initiatory rite of Circumcision for the Circumcision of the Flesh Covenant—the Covenant
of Bondage, and the gracious invisible Circumcision—the initiatory
rite for the invisible Covenant of Promise. The main problem here
is in the fact that these interpreters did not fully understand the
coexistence of the visible and the invisible characteristics of
Abraham’s covenants with God.
“On the other hand, God
requires integrity and holiness of life; He indicates by the symbol
how this could be attained, that is, by cutting off in man whatever
is born of the flesh, for his whole nature had become vicious. He
therefore reminded Abraham by the external sign, that he was
SPIRITUALLY to cut off the corruption of the flesh; and to this
Moses has also alluded in Deut.10:16.”
aaron-We must be careful not
read more into something than was really intended: Speaking of the
ability to equate the symbolic removing of the flesh with Abraham’s
awareness of the cutting off of the corruption of the flesh. This
assessment by John Calvin would have no direct support from
Scripture and little genuine application in
the light of the total depravity of man.
(*)“And to show that it was
not the work of man, but of God, he commanded tender infants to be
circumcised, who, on account of their age, could not have performed
such a command. Moses has indeed expressly mentioned SPIRITUAL
CIRCUMCISION as the work of divine power, as you will find in
Deut.30:6, where he says, "The Lord will Circumcise thine heart:"
and the Prophets afterwards declared the same thing much more
clearly.”
(*)aaron-John Calvin is once
again amalgamating the visible with the invisible, which creates
considerable confusion for all of His peoples. One must understand
that the circumcision of these eight-day-old infants had nothing
whatsoever to do with the invisible Circumcision of the Heart. The
visible circumcision of these eight-day-old infants is more likely a
demonstration of God’s absolute sovereignty in the gracious
reconciliation of His peoples. In that, it fully demonstrates the
natural inability of man when coming into God’s Covenants.
(*)“As there are two points
in baptism now, so there were formerly in circumcision; for it was a
symbol of a new life, and also of the remission of sins. But the
fact as to Abraham himself, that righteousness preceded
circumcision, is not always the case in sacraments, as it is evident
from the case of Isaac and his posterity: but God intended to give
such an instance once at the beginning, that (*b) no one might
ascribe salvation to external signs.”
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.164,165
Consequently, the point that
is being overlooked here is the true representation of physical
circumcision. That visible circumcision was in all reality, the God
established visible institutional initiatory rite that would bring
the corporate peoples of God into full membership in the visible
component of Abraham’s Covenants with God. Then in addition to that
initial visible initiation, it had an invisible character in view as
well—the Circumcision of Heart: Which is an attribute that belongs
to our Sovereign God, and its administration is still completely
outside our human capacity or experience. The bottom line of this
matter is the fact that physical Circumcision was, as we know from
the Scriptures themselves, the visible SIGN of the
invisible SEAL of God's covenants with Abraham and his seed:
Just as we now find recorded in Romans chapter four - verse eleven.
What John Calvin has overlooked here, is the fact that the invisible
SEAL of his righteousness—the Circumcised Heart, was actually
present in Abraham long before the visible SIGN was applied.
So once again, we must see
that the visible Circumcision was in fact the necessary visible
example of the invisible Circumcision of the heart: That
Circumcision that is supernaturally performed by God's Holy Spirit
on the hearts of all of God’s elect priests.
aaron- God now shows us the
universal character of His reconciliation, and the basis for this
dramatic transition in His salvation program:
1. Romans chapter four has
brought our father Abraham into view to show the relationship
between this dispensation—the Christian era, and the visible and
invisible Covenants of Grace that are the component parts of God’s
Abrahamic Covenant of Grace. The same Covenants of Grace that surly
include the visible Circumcision of the Flesh Covenant—the Covenant
of Bondage, and the invisible Covenant of Promise that would find
its complete fruition in the lineage of Isaac and Jacob: Which is
the same group that comprise the invisible Messianic Covenant line.
The one important aspect of this universal intent, was to show the
fulfillment of God's original promise to Abraham: That he would be
the father of many nations—that through Abraham’s Seed all the
nations of the earth would be blessed.
Look again at these
questions and answers:
Question-8} What did Abraham
find according to the flesh? If Abraham was justified by works, he
has the glory not God.
Question-9} What do the
Scriptures say? Abraham believed God, and it was accounted unto him
for righteousness.
Question-10} Is this
blessing pronounced upon the Circumcision, or upon the
Uncircumcision also? To Abraham, his faith was counted for
righteousness.
Question-11} How then was it
accounted? When he was in Circumcision or in Uncircumcision? Not
in Circumcision, but in Uncircumcision.
Physical circumcision was
the visible institutional initiatory rite into God’s Abrahamic
Covenant of Grace and the designed visible sign of the invisible
seal that Abraham had previously received—the invisible seal of
God’s righteousness: The righteousness of the God given faith and
regeneration that Abraham had previously received while he was still
in a state of Uncircumcision. These facts should constrain all of
us to better understand the supernatural influence of God in the
entire salvation process. I believe that the invisible
Circumcision—the Circumcision of the Heart, must be taken into
account whenever we consider the context of this passage. Abraham
was to be the father of all of them that would ultimately
come to believe in the God of creation. So “all of them that
believe” would be inclusive of all of God’s visible called corporate
peoples as well. Which would be inclusive of the institutional
collective of visible Israel and the institutional collective of the
visible Christian Church. A compilation of the visible corporate
peoples of God, as well as all of God’s invisible elect priests.
[Ekklesolia en Ekklesia]
This Scripture expressly
shows us how and why we can now relate to Abraham as our true
father. Abraham, from the time that God’s Covenants of Grace were
given to him in Gen.17, was to be the father of the visible
Circumcision, the invisible Circumcision, as well as all of the
world’s Baptized Uncircumcision who are being called by God.
Romans chapter four also
presents the most definitive explanation for this dispensation of
grace. It clearly tells us that God had always intended to include
the Nations within His reconciliation: That when He made His
gracious covenants with Abraham, the Nations were, at that time, to
be ultimately included.
2. It is also necessary that
we walk in the faith of Abraham—our God given FAITH that carries all
of us to our eternal reward.
3. This promise to Abraham
did not come through the law. Matter of fact, to demonstrate God’s
matchless grace from beginning to end, the law must always be seen
as being subordinate to GRACE within the make-up of Abraham’s
Covenants with God. For this cause it is of faith, that it may be
according to grace, to the end, that the promise may be sure to
all the seed. Ref.Eph.2:8
4. Now it (the Everlasting
Covenant of Grace) was not written for Abraham's sake alone that it
was counted unto him, but for our sake (we of the Church) also, unto
whom it shall be accounted. The "it" in v.23 can only be defined as
the Everlasting Covenant—God’s Abrahamic Covenant of Grace.
The fact that the visible
Circumcision and the Uncircumcision have become essentially equal in
the eyes of God is no longer open for debate.
v.16 "Not only to those who
are of the law (physical Israel), but also to those who are of the
faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all."
v.17 "God who gives life to
the dead (physical Israel) and calls those things that are not (the
Nations) as if they were." prohibits even the suggestion of any
separate consideration, or that any distinction be made between the
visible corporate peoples of God: Jews and non-Jews—as well as
historic Israel and the saints of today’s invisible Church.
Ekklesolia en Ekklesia
aaron- Chapter four of
Romans, with all of its intricate details concerning the Everlasting
Covenant of Grace, has become one of the most important sections of
Scripture in the entire Bible. When taken literally and in a
straightforward manner, this Scripture confirms the foundational
principles for the origins of our covenant relationship with God.
1. It speaks of Father
Abraham as an individual, not as a nation.
2. It also shows the
inclusiveness of God when He made covenant with Father Abraham:
Through God's Covenant, Abraham was a Gentile who more or less
became a Jew; Who was the Uncircumcision who ultimately became the
invisible Circumcision and then the visible Circumcision.
aaron - We saw from the
Deut.30:6 reference, that Calvin fully understood the prerequisite
for the Circumcision of the heart: And that the Circumcision of the
heart was a sovereign act of God alone. The main problem that I now
sense in this discussion, becomes evident when we attempt to blend
/or amalgamate those things that are visible together with those
things that are invisible: As well as our inability to discreetly
distinguish between the two.
To say that a thing is
symbolic, and then to understand it and believe it as such, is a
very difficult thing to accomplish. The only way that one could
ascribe a sovereign act of God to a symbol that is nominally
performed by man, without clearly distinguishing between the two, is
to possibly lack that complete understanding of the act or the
symbol.
To say that Abraham's
righteousness preceded circumcision is to view circumcision only in
its visible physical context.
But when we begin to
consider circumcision in its broader context—that is, to consider
the invisible Circumcision as well—the Circumcision of the heart, we
would surely be constrained from coming to such a conclusion
concerning Abraham.
Now if our understanding of
regeneration is correct, we must conclude that Abraham's invisible
Circumcision (his regeneration) absolutely coincided with, and
served as an invisible seal of, his infused righteousness from God.
This fact would require us to gain that deeper understanding into
the origin of Circumcision, and for us to understand that the
Circumcision of the heart literally came first in the case of God’s
elect peoples—such as Abel, along with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
One might conclude from Paul’s letter to the Galatians that the
elect have their hearts circumcised while they were still in their
mother’s womb. Ref.Lu.1:41 and Gal.1:15 This is not an easy matter
for us to consider, but very necessary. Observing both cases of its
use: of that in Gen.17:10 and that in Rom.4:11, the word sign
has the meaning of flag; beacon; evidence;
indication; mark. What I am suggesting here is that the
visible circumcision was also intended as a sign; an
indication of something hidden; a visible sign in demonstration of
the invisible covenantal seal; a visible sign of the invisible
Circumcision of the Heart.
Calvin continues on his
Commentary of Romans:
"The word `sign' in this
passage, seems not to mean an outward token of something inward...as
it were, as a mark in the flesh. So MACKNIGHT renders it, `The mark
of circumcision.' That circumcision was a sign or a
symbol of what was Spiritual, is evident: but this is not what
is taught here. Circumcision is expressly called `a token,' or a
sign, in Gen.17:11; but it is said to have been `a token of the
covenant,' that is, a proof and an evidence of it. The
design of circumcision is expressed by the next word, - seal. This
sometimes signifies the instrument, 1Ki.21:8; and sometimes the
impression, Rev.5:1: and the impression was used for various
purposes, - to close up a document, to secure a thing, and also to
confirm an agreement. It is taken here in the latter sense;
Circumcision was a `seal,' a confirmation, an evidence, a proof, or
a pledge, `of the righteousness' obtained `by faith.' We meet not
with any distinct statement of this kind in Genesis: it is what the
Apostle had gathered, and rightly gathered, from the account given
us of what took place between God and Abraham." $$
aaron-First, physical
circumcision was a visible sign that would enable us to
comprehend the invisible seal. The actual seal of the
righteousness that God had instilled into Abraham by His
regeneration at the time of their first meeting. Just as
regeneration does also now seal all of the elect throughout the
Christian era—unto the day of redemption. Sealed by this same
Circumcision of our hearts. Ref.2Cor.1:22; Eph.1:13; 4:30 But then
at the very same time, the institutional initiatory rite of physical
circumcision must also be seen as the token of the visible component
of the Abrahamic Covenant of Grace—the visible Circumcision of the
Flesh Covenant—the Covenant of Bondage. Then this same scenario
would be applicable for baptism during the New Testament Christian
era. Water Baptism must be seen as the New Testament token for the
visible component of the Abrahamic Covenant of Grace. But the thing
that is being missed by most commentators is the fact that the
initiatory rites for the invisible Covenant of Promise are exactly
the same for both the Old Testament and New Testament dispensations.
"Mark how the circumcision
of Abraham confirms our faith with regard to gratuitous
righteousness; for it was the sealing of the righteousness of faith,
that righteousness might be imputed to us who believe. And thus
Paul, by a remarkable dexterity, makes to recoil on his opponents
what they might have adduced as an objection: for since
the truth and import of circumcision were found in an uncircumcised
state, there was no ground for the Jews to elevate themselves
so much above the Gentiles. But as a doubt might arise, whether it
behooves us, after the example of Abraham, to confirm also the same
righteousness by the sign of Circumcision, how came the Apostle to
make this omission?
Even because he thought that
the question was sufficiently settled by the draft of his argument:
for as this truth had been admitted, that Circumcision availed only
to seal the grace of God, it follows, that it is now of no benefit
to us, who have a sign instituted in its place by our Lord. (??) As
then THERE IS NO NECESSITY NOW FOR CIRCUMCISION, WHERE BAPTISM IS,
he was not disposed to contend unnecessarily for that respecting
which there was no doubt, that is, WHY THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH
WAS NOT (??) SEALED TO THE GENTILES IN THE SAME WAY AS IT WAS TO
ABRAHAM." Footnote 1—p.166
aaron-(??)THERE IS!!! AND IT
WAS!!! Whether we are discussing the institution of Israel during
the Old Testament dispensation or the institution of the Christian
Church during the New Testament dispensation, regeneration seals all
of the elect in the exact same way—with God’s Circumcision of the
heart, by His Holy Spirit. Ref.Phil.3:3 But where visible
circumcision was and is the established Old Testament institutional
initiatory rite into the visible component of the Abrahamic Covenant
of Grace, it should be understood that it is only the visible
institutional initiatory rite that has been changed to water baptism
for the called New Testament Christian Church. Have you gotten it
yet? The Circumcision of the Heart is the only access into the
invisible Covenant of Promise! Ref.Phil.3:3 <**>
"To believe in circumcision
means, that the Gentiles, being satisfied with their own condition,
did not introduce the seal of Circumcision: and so the preposition
(dia) by, is put for (en) in." p.166
aaron-For any proper
understanding here, this statement should read “the Gentiles, being
satisfied with their own condition, did not introduce the visible
sign of circumcision.”
aaron-I repeat, there is a
huge misunderstanding about Circumcision not being the seal
for the invisible segment of today’s Congregation. This
misunderstanding is the result of not discriminating between the
complex characteristics of circumcision: first, the visible
circumcision of the flesh, and secondly, the invisible Circumcision
of the heart. And understanding that the second Circumcision—the
invisible Circumcision of the heart, is the only legitimate
circumcision for the construct of God’s invisible priestly line: the
only legitimate seal for Historic Israel, and consequently, the only
legitimate seal as well for God’s hidden Covenant of Promise that
includes the invisible Church of Christ as Jews, the Circumcision
and Historic Israel. Whenever we have a situation that involves multiple
meanings for identical words, confusion naturally comes in on every
side. No one who has read the Bible would believe that physical
circumcision is required or has any benefit for today’s Christian
with respect to the visible Christian Church. It is only the
invisible Circumcision of the heart that is absolutely necessary for
our membership in the hidden Israel of God. Remembering that within
the entire membership of what we have identified as the invisible
Church, the identification by the Apostle Paul is unambiguous—"WE
ARE THE CIRCUMCISION"! Ref.Phil.3:3 <**>
A clearer understanding of
these complex identifications that were set forth in Rom.2:25-29 and
Rom.9:6-8 are absolutely necessary for our theological progress.
Properly interpreting these complex definitions is essential before
anyone can even hope to understand these very complicated issues
that involve God’s visible dispositions and God’s invisible
dispositions.
“For not through the law was
the promise to Abraham or to his seed that he should be heir of the
world, but through the righteousness of faith. For if they that are
of the law are heirs, faith is made void, and the promise is made
ineffective. For the law works wrath, but where there is no law,
neither is there transgression.” (Rom.4:13-15)
aaron-I would like to
comment on “For if they that are of the law are heirs, faith is made
void, and the promise is made ineffective.” This passage, along
with a number of other New Testament passages that seem to
disenfranchise those of visible Israel—“they that are of the law”,
is explaining more the selective membership within the Covenant of
Promise and that the physical seed of Abraham would not be
automatically included simply because of their physical lineage
within the visible Abrahamic Covenant of Grace. Paul is saying that
if all of visible Israel was automatically included, then the
Covenant of Promise would become completely “ineffective” and
unnecessary, and our understanding of God’s elective GRACE would
loose all if its meaning.
“13. For the PROMISE that he
should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham or to his SEED
through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.
"The Apostle, in Heb.1:2,
calls Christ the heir of all the good things of God; for the
adoption which we obtain through His favor RESTORES to us the
possession of the inheritance which we lost in Adam; and as under
the type of the land of Canaan, not only the hope of a heavenly life
was exhibited to Abraham, but also the full and complete blessing of
God, the Apostle rightly teaches us, that DOMINION OF THE WORLD was
PROMISED to him. Some taste of this the godly have in the present
life; for how much soever they may at times be oppressed with want,
yet as they partake with a peaceable conscience of those things
which God has created for their use, and as they enjoy through His
mercy and good-will His earthly benefits no otherwise than as
pledges and earnests of eternal life, THEIR POVERTY does in no
degree prevent them from acknowledging heaven, and the earth, and
the sea, as their own possessions."
Calvin's commentary - Romans
- p.169
(aaron-I was wondering, what
is this Reformed poverty that Calvin is commonly referring to?)
“For this cause it is of
faith, that it may be according to grace, to the end that the
promise may be sure to all the seed. Not to that only which
is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of
Abraham, who is the father of us all. (As it is written: A
father of many nations have I made you.) Before him whom he
believed, even God, who gives life to the dead, and calls the things
that are not as if they were. Who in hope believed against hope, to
the end that he might become a father of many nations, according to
that which had been spoken: So shall your seed be.”
aaron-This is the passage
that most clearly explains the transition and fulfillment of God’s
promises within the Covenants He made with Abraham. It begins here
with the conformation of Eph.2:8 as the means for the fulfillment of
God’s promised Universal Reconciliation. Abraham’s Covenants would
now include all the world’s peoples, tribes, tongues, and nations.
“And without being weakened
in faith (Abraham) considered his own body now as good as dead (he
being about a hundred years old), and the deadness of Sarah's womb:
Yet, looking upon the promise of God, he wavered not through
unbelief, but (was strengthened) through faith, giving glory to God,
and being fully assured that (that) which He had promised, He was
able also to perform. Wherefore also it was accounted unto him for
righteousness.” (Rom.4:16-22)
“16. Therefore it is of
faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the PROMISE might be
sure to ALL THE SEED; not to that only which is of the law, but to
that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us
ALL,
(?)"Hence, also, we may
easily learn, that grace is not to be taken, as some imagine, for
the gift of regeneration, but for a gratuitous favor: for as
REGENERATION IS NEVER PERFECT, it can never suffice to pacify souls,
nor of itself can it make the PROMISE certain.”
aaron-(?)No? I believe that
regeneration, as it is a perfect work of God’s Holy Spirit, can in
every respect fulfill its intended purpose. It can and it does make
the faithful PROMISE of God certain! Even though the flesh
continues to be subjected to its constant struggle with sin, and the
individual may at times strain their relationship with God by going
their own way, the soul of regenerated man cannot sin.
Ref.Rom.7:14-25 <*>
“Though these words mean in
another place those who, being absurd zealots of the law, bind
themselves to its yoke, and boast of their (??) confidence in it,
yet here they mean simply the JEWISH nation, to whom the law of the
Lord had been delivered. For Paul teaches us in another passage,
that all who remain bound to the dominion of the law, are subject to
a curse; it is then certain that they are excluded from the
participation of grace. He does not then call them the servants of
the law, who, adhering to the righteousness of works, renounce
Christ; but they were those Jews who had been brought up in the law,
and yet professed the name of Christ. But that the sentence may be
made clearer, let it be worded thus, - `Not to those only who are of
the law, but to all who imitate the faith of Abraham, though they
had not the law before.'
The relative has the meaning
of a causative particle; FOR HE MEANT TO PROVE, THAT THE GENTILES
WERE BECOME PARTAKERS OF THIS GRACE, INASMUCH AS BY THE SAME ORACLE,
BY WHICH THE HEIRSHIP WAS CONFERRED ON ABRAHAM AND HIS SEED, WERE
THE GENTILES ALSO CONSTITUTED HIS SEED:"
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.173-174
aaron-“All the seed” means
the universal incorporation of the Jews and the Gentiles within
God’s reconciliation. It shows the inclusion of those who were of
the law—the Jews, as well as those who were of the faith of
Abraham—the Gentile believers: making Abraham the father of us all.
It would more than seem that the early Christian Church had a strong
drive to exclude the first peoples of God from the Abrahamic
Covenant of Grace—exclusive rather than inclusive.
The
Problem With Jewish Christianity
aaron-"Thy SEED" according
to Gal.3:16 would represent CHRIST.
“17. (As it is written, I
have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he
believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those
things which be not as though they were.”
aaron-This verse shows the
full expanse of God's intended call when He told Abraham that he was
to be the father of many nations. The evident intent here was to
extend this call far beyond the nations of Israel. This “dead” that
is being “quickened” is best defined in Rom.11:15: Where Paul tells
us that the receiving of the efficacy of Christ’s atoning sacrifice
by the visible Jews—past, present, and future, is in fact `life from
the dead': As it will be fully manifested in the resurrection of the
dead that is pictured in Mat.25. Paul also tells us through this
same passage, that `those things that were not', would be
specifically defined as those believers from the Nations who respond
to God’s call; the Christian Church, visible and invisible, that
`are now called as if they were'. That is, just as if they always
were a part of God's family. Then to be `called as if they were',
would also mean that the invisible Christians of the Ekklesolia
would have to be called by their historic names: Israel, the
Circumcision, and Jews.
"The simple notion of
calling, naming, regarding, or representing, is more consistent with
the passage, and with the construction of the sentence: and the
various modes of rendering it, which critics have purposed, have
risen from not taking the word in its most obvious meaning. The
literal version is, `and who calls things not existing as
existing.' The reference is evidently to the declaration, `I have
made thee the father of many nations.' This had then no real
existence; but God represented it as having an existence already.
Far-fetched meanings are sometimes adopted, when the plainest and
the most obvious is passed by."
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.175-176 footnote 1
aaron-This is
simply the fulfillment of God’s earlier promises that were made
early on in His Abrahamic Covenant of Grace.
“18. Who against hope
believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations,
according to that which was spoken, So shall thy SEED be.
"If we thus read, the sense
is, that when there was no probable reason, yea, when all things
were against him, he yet continued to believe. And, doubtless, there
is nothing more injurious to faith than to fasten our minds to our
eyes, that we may from what we see, seek a reason for our hope.
We may also read, `above
hope,' and perhaps more suitably; as though he had said that by his
faith he far surpassed all that he could conceive; for except faith
flies upward on celestial wings, so as to look down on all the
perceptions of the flesh as on things far below, it will stick fast
in the mud of the world. But Paul uses the word hope twice in this
verse: in the first instance, he means a probable evidence for
hoping, such as can be derived from nature and carnal reason; in the
second, he refers to faith given by God; for when he had no
ground for hoping he yet in hope relied on the PROMISE of God; and
he thought it a sufficient reason for hoping, that the Lord had
PROMISED, however incredible the thing was in itself."
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.176-177
“Now it was not written
for (Abraham's) sake alone that it was accounted unto him,
but for our sake (we of the Church) also, unto whom it shall
be accounted; who believe on Him that raised Jesus our Lord
from the dead, who was delivered up for our trespasses, and
was raised for our justification.” (Rom.4:23-25)
"A proof from example is not
always valid, of which I have before reminded you; lest this should
be questioned, Paul expressly affirms, that in the person of Abraham
was exhibited an example of a common righteousness, which belongs
equally to all. WE ARE by this passage, REMINDED OF THE DUTY OF
SEEKING PROFIT FROM EXAMPLES RECORDED IN SCRIPTURE. That history is
teacher of what life ought to be, is what heathens have with truth
said; but as it is handed down by them, no one can derive from it
sound instruction. Scripture alone justly claims to itself an office
of this kind. For in the first place it prescribes general rules, by
which we may test every other history, so as to render it
serviceable to us: and in the second place, it clearly points out
what things are to be followed, and what things are to be avoided.
But as to doctrine, which it
especially teaches, it possesses this peculiarity, - that it clearly
reveals the providence of God, His justice and goodness towards His
own people, and His judgments on the wicked.
What then is recorded of
Abraham is by Paul denied to have been written only for his sake;
for the subject is not what belongs to the special call of one or of
any particular person; but that way of obtaining righteousness is
described, which is ever the same with regard to all; and it is what
belongs to the common father of the (!) faithful, on whom the eyes
of all ought to be fixed...
But by saying, not on his
account only, he seems to (announce), that it was written partly for
his sake. Hence some think, that what Abraham obtained by faith was
commemorated to his praise, because the Lord will have His servants
to be forever remembered, according to what Solomon says, that their
name will be blessed. (Prov.10:7) But what if you take the words,
not on his account only, in a simpler form, as though it were some
singular privilege, not fit to be made an example of, but yet
suitable to teach us, who must be justified in the ($) same manner?
This certainly would be a more appropriate sense.”
Calvin's Commentary - Romans
- pp.182-184
$ “24. BUT FOR US ALSO, to
whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on Him (GOD) that raised up
Jesus our Lord from the dead;
aaron-Since Paul was the
Apostle of the Gentiles, the "US" in the above Scripture would
certainly represent the believing Gentiles who have found their way
into God's Abrahamic Covenant of Grace.
“25. Who was delivered for
our offenses, and was raised again for our justification.
Finally, Romans chapter four
is perfectly summarized in verses 23 and 24:
"Now, it was not written for
his (Abraham's) sake alone, that it was imputed to him (Abraham);
But for us (Gentiles) also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we
(Gentiles) believe on Him (GOD) that raised up Jesus our Lord from
the dead."
aaron-Especially note the
inclusiveness of Paul’s view forward.
THE ABRAHAMIC COVENANT OF
GRACE
The Everlasting Covenant-Review
”NOW his father Zacharias
was filled with the Holy Spirit, and prophesied, saying: Blessed is
the Lord God of Israel, for He has visited and redeemed His people,
and has raised up a Horn of Salvation for us in the house of His
servant David, as He spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets, who
have been since the world began, that we should be saved from our
enemies and from the hand of all who hate us, to perform the mercy
promised to our fathers and to remember His Holy Covenant, the oath
which He swore to our father Abraham.” Lu.1:67-73
aaron-I would have to
believe that the fulfillment of the promised Seed (which was JESUS),
and the raising up of this Horn of Salvation (which was JESUS) in
the house of His servant David, would satisfy the covenant oath that
God had made with father Abraham. The Holy Covenant absolutely
contained the sworn oath! The Holy Covenant is the sworn oath—the
Good News—the Gospel: Where God, in fulfillment of His promise to
father Abraham, is now opening wide the door of salvation to all
peoples, tribes, tongues, and Nations.
The Everlasting Covenant -
The Covenant of Grace-
1. “I will establish My
Covenant between Me and you (Abraham) and your seed after you,
throughout their generations for an Everlasting Covenant.”
(Gen.17:7)
2. “You shall call his name
Isaac and I will establish with him My Everlasting Covenant.”
(Gen.17:19)
3. “The Covenant which He
made with Abraham, and the oath unto Isaac, and confirmed the same
unto Jacob for a statute, to Israel for an Everlasting Covenant.”
(Ps.105:9 and 10)
4. Additionally, we are told
in Gen.22:18; 12:3; 17:4; 26:4; Acts.3:25; and Rom.4:17a, that: “In
your (Abraham's) seed shall all the nations of the earth be
blessed.”
This same promise is also
confirmed in these following verses:
a. “The Scriptures
foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached
the gospel beforehand unto Abraham, saying: In you shall all the
nations be blessed.” (Gal.3:8)
b. “That upon the Gentiles
might come the blessing of Abraham in Christ Jesus.” (Gal.3:14a)
aaron-The establishment of
the Everlasting Covenant in its origin, was never intended to be
limited only to the nations of Israel. Its initial intent was to be
all-inclusive. Each and every nation of the entire earth was to be
given access to its benefits.
Because of the foresight of
the Scriptures, in that the Scriptures clearly tell us that God had
always planned to extend His hand of salvation to the Gentiles, the
good news was preached to Abraham: In your seed shall all the
nations of the earth be blessed.
aaron-It is not at all the
way that many suppose—that this blessed covenant could belong
entirely to Abraham's physical offspring. Unfortunately, many
Christians throughout history have completely missed the point on
this matter. They have failed to see and to understand the original
measure of God's redemptive plan. That God's original redemptive
plan—God’s Abrahamic Covenant of Grace, was designed to include all
peoples, tribes, tongues, and Nations.
Question 1.
Can we prove that the Covenant was universal in its origin?
Answer 1. YES! The proof
would lie in how God formally established the Covenants of Grace
with Abraham. Then as we view these passages, we can see that the
universal intent was always there in that initial
institution. Now if we could accept the Scriptures at their face
value, I am convinced we will all be able to understand and receive
these clear teachings.
-Prediction-
a. Gen.22:18 "and in your
(Abraham's) seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
because you (Abraham) have obeyed My voice."
b. Gen.12:3 "and I will
bless them that bless you, and him that curses you will I curse: and
in you (Abraham) shall all the families of the earth be blessed."
c. Gen.17:4 "As for me,
behold, my covenant is with you (Abraham), and you (Abraham) shall
be a father of a multitude of nations."
d. Gen.26:4 "and I will
multiply your (Abraham's) seed as the stars of heaven, and will give
unto your (Abraham's) seed all these lands; and in your (Abraham's)
seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;"
aaron-We can plainly see
from these Old Testament predictions, that Abraham's posterity was
to reach far beyond the visible nations of Israel. His extended
family was to ultimately encompass each and every nation of the
whole earth. Then we find these same truths plainly confirmed in
the New Testament:
-Conformation-
e. Acts.3:25 "you are the
sons of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with your
fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in your seed shall all the
families of the earth be blessed."
aaron-This Covenant blessing
that was promised to father Abraham, was to be extended to all the
earth’s nations through his seed—Jesus.
f. Rom.4:17a "(as it is
written, A father of many nations have I made you [Abraham])"
g. Gal.3:8 "And the
Scriptures, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles (the
Nations) by faith, preached the gospel beforehand unto Abraham,
saying, In you (Abraham) shall all the nations be blessed."
aaron-We can see by these
last two verses, the clear conformation for the universality of
God's promise to Abraham: That his posterity would be inclusive of
some others also—even some from every nation of the world.
h. Gal.3:16 "Now to Abraham
were the promises spoken, and to his seed. He says not, And to
seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to YOUR SEED, WHICH
IS CHRIST."
aaron-It is here that the
Apostle Paul rests his argument. He openly states that God's
complex Covenant with Abraham was also directed toward a particular
Seed; That this invisible Covenant of Promise would find its full
efficacy and manifestation in none other than the Blessed Seed, our
Lord Jesus Christ.
Even though there is an
obvious distinction between the institutions of visible Israel and
the visible Christian Church, we will discover that all distinction
within the Covenant of Promise is eternally removed. And that
dichotomy contains the precise riddle we are trying to work through
in this paper.
“As it is written: A father
of many nations have I made you... Before him whom he believed, even
God, who gives life to the dead (visible Israel), and calls the
things that are not (the Nations), as though they were. Who in hope
believed against hope, to the end, that he might become a father of
many nations, according to that which had been spoken: So shall your
seed be.
aaron-The children of
physical Israel, who were dead in sin, now have life with God
through the finished work of Christ. We Gentiles, who were not,
because of this same finished work of Christ, are now, as if we
always were—a part of God's family. The universality of God’s
reconciliation existed from the very beginning: Then Abraham's
complex posterity was to be gathered out from each and every
nation of the world.
Jesus, the light of the
world-
-Prediction-
“Yes, He says, it is too
light a thing that You (Jesus) should be My servant to raise up the
tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will also
give You (Jesus) for a light to the Gentiles (the Nations), that You
may be My salvation unto the end of the earth.” (Ref.Isa.49:6)
-Conformation-
“I have set You (Jesus) for
a light of the Gentiles, that you should be for salvation unto the
uttermost part of the earth.” Acts.13:47
-Prediction-
“Jehovah says this: In an
acceptable time have I answered You (Jesus), in a day of salvation
have I helped You, and I will preserve You, and give You for a
Covenant of the people.” (Ref.Isa.49:8a)
-Conformation-
2Cor.6:2 plainly tells us
all, that “today is the day of salvation.”
-Prediction-
“I Jehovah have called You
(Jesus) in righteousness, and will hold Your hand, and will keep
You, and give You for a Covenant of the people (visible Israel), for
a Light of the Gentiles.” (Ref.Isa.42:6)
-Conformation-
Simeon declares the identity
and purpose of Jesus in Lu.2:25-32—“And behold, there was a man in
Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and this man was righteous and
devout, looking for the Consolation of Israel: And the Holy Spirit
was upon him. And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Spirit, that
he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ
(Anointed). And he came in the Spirit into the temple: And when the
parents brought the child Jesus, that they might do concerning Him,
after the custom of the law: Then he (Simeon) received Him into his
arms, and blessed God, and said: Now let Your servant depart, Lord,
according to Your word, in peace, for my eyes have seen Your
Salvation, which You have prepared before the face of all
peoples: A light of revelation to the Gentiles (the
Nations), and the glory of Your people Israel.”
aaron-It must be remembered
that the Old Covenant was still in effect at the time of this
revelation.
Simeon declared: Jesus, the
fulfillment of God's promises:
(1) Jesus was the
Consolation (Comforter) of Israel.
(2) Jesus was the Salvation
of God unto all peoples.
(3) Jesus was the Light of
the Gentiles (the Nations).
(4) Jesus was the Glory of
Israel.
(5) Jesus was the Salvation
of our God unto the end of the earth.
“The people that walked in
darkness (the Nations) have seen a Great Light, they that dwell in
the land of the shadow of death, upon them has the Light shined.”
(Isa.9:2; Ref. Mat.4:16; Lu.1:79)
“Jesus spoke unto them,
saying, I am the light of the world.” (Jn.8:12)
aaron-The Second Covenant,
or New Covenant, must be seen as the consummation of God’s Abrahamic
Covenant of Grace: As it is entirely by grace through faith, and
that according to promise. It is exactly the same now as Abraham
received from God in Gen.17:1-27. Both the visible Covenant of
Grace and the invisible Covenant of Promise is efficacious by God’s
grace through faith.
This Covenant of Grace is
completely adequate for all: Not only that which is of the law
(visible Israel), but also that which is of the faith of Abraham,
who is the father of us ALL.
Then we also (who have
become a part of the invisible ELECT), are like Isaac was, children
of promise; the invisible Congregation; the invisible Church; the
Historic Israel of God. Now some would wonder, what percentage of
the visible Christian Church is a part of God’s invisible Christian
Church? My answer is, I have no idea! That answer is completely in
the hands of God.
Jesus did establish the New
Covenant—
God’s Universal
Reconciliation
“Now the God of peace, who
brought again from the dead the Great Shepherd of the sheep with the
blood of an Eternal Covenant, our Lord Jesus.” (Heb.13:20)
(EVERLASTING and ETERNAL are identical words.)
“How much more shall the
blood of Christ, who through the Eternal Spirit offered Himself
without blemish unto God? And for this cause He is the Mediator of
a New Covenant.” (Heb.9:14a and 15a)
(Mediator = Reconciler; go
between.)
Calvin writes: "And for this
cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of
death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the
first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of
eternal inheritance." Heb.9:15
“15. And for this cause he
is the Mediator of the New Testament, &c.
<*>”He further records the
virtue and efficacy of his death by saying that he paid the price
for sins under the first covenant or testament, which could not be
blotted out by the blood of beasts; by which words he was seeking to
draw away the Jews from the law to Christ. For, if the law was so
weak that all the remedies it applied for expiating sins did by no
means accomplish what they represented, who could rest in it as in a
safe harbor?”
Calvin's Commentary -
Hebrews - p.206
aaron-I am not convinced
that John Calvin is, in all respects, viewing this verse in its
proper direction. Yes, the sacrifice of Christ fully satisfies the
debt for the sins that were committed under the Old Covenant. But I
believe that this verse is speaking more about the universal
character of Christ's sacrifice than about any specifics. That is,
it is because of the completeness of Christ's sacrifice on the cross
that He became the Mediator. Then it was through this blessed
sacrifice that Jesus made propitiation for the sins of the world
Ref.Jn.3:16:
First, He made propitiation
for all of the transgressions that were bound-up under the First
Covenant. Ref.Rom.3:25 Which is simply making reference to the
bondage of sin that was and is experienced throughout physical
Israel’s sojourn on this earth. As we were previously told that His
atonement was for "the Jews first", that the Scriptures might be
fulfilled. But for John Calvin to state “For, if the law was so
weak that all the remedies it applied for expiating sins did by no
means accomplish what they represented, who could rest in it as in a
safe harbor?” is in a sense, a bit misleading. All of these legal
“remedies” that Calvin is referring to—the many sacrifices that are
bound up in the Law with their intended efficacy for “expiating
sins”, were in fact established by God Himself for that intended
purpose. I might even suggest that Christ’s complete atonement for
sin upon the cross fully conveys the efficacy for all of the Old
Testament sacrifices—“that by means of death, for the redemption of
the transgressions that were under the first testament”. <*>
Then after that, the way of
salvation was opened for others also: That even "they which are
called (from among the Nations) might receive the promise". This is
the Good news—the gospel: In fulfillment of God’s Abrahamic Covenant
of Grace, the door of salvation is now opened to all the peoples,
tribes, tongues, and nations of the entire world.
They who are called, &c.
"The object of the divine covenant is, that having been adopted as
children, we may at length be made heirs of eternal life. The
Apostle teaches us that we obtain this by Christ. It is hence
evident, that in him is the fulfillment of the covenant."
Calvin's Commentary -
Hebrews - p.207
“But now He has obtained a
ministry the more excellent, by so much as He (Jesus) is the
Mediator of a better Covenant.” (Heb.8:6)
“But He (Jesus), when He had
offered one sacrifice for sin forever, sat down on the right hand of
God.” (Heb.10:12)
aaron-Jesus was the Eternal
Sacrifice! And through that Eternal Sacrifice – “Through His own
blood, He (Christ) entered in once for all into the Holy Place,
having obtained Eternal Redemption.” (Heb.9:12)
“Jesus, the Mediator of a
New Covenant.” (Heb.12:24)
“Jesus, the surety of a
better Covenant.” (Heb.7:22)
aaron-Jesus established the
New Covenant at the last Passover supper. Then we see that the New
Covenant was consummated at the cross, activated at Pentecost.
“He (Jesus) took bread, and
when He gave thanks, He broke it, and gave it to them (the
disciples), saying: This is My body which is given for you, this do
in remembrance of Me. And THE CUP in like manner after
supper, saying: "THIS IS THE NEW COVENANT IN MY BLOOD", that
which is poured out for you. (Mat.26:26-28/Mk.14:22-24/Lu.22:19,20)
This New Covenant
celebration is also confirmed to the Church in 1Cor.11:23-26—“For I
received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the
Lord Jesus in the night in which He was betrayed, took bread, and
when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said: This is My body
which is for you, do this in remembrance of Me. In like manner also
the cup, after supper, saying: "THIS CUP IS THE NEW
COVENANT IN MY BLOOD", this do, as often as you drink it, in
remembrance of Me. For as often as you eat this bread, and drink
this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till He comes.” Amen.
The New Covenant is the
fulfillment of God’s Abrahamic Covenant of Grace
aaron-The Old Covenant and
the New Covenants are extensions of the Everlasting Covenant that
God had made with Abraham and his seed. Only God's Covenant with the
nations of Israel, the provisions of the law given through Moses,
were in a very limited sense, set aside /subjugated.
“For when God made (the)
promise to Abraham, since He could swear by none greater, He swore
by Himself, saying: Surely, blessing, I will bless you, and
multiplying, I will multiply you. And thus, having patiently
endured, he (Abraham) obtained the promise. Wherein, God, being
minded to show more abundantly unto the heirs of the promise
the immutability of His counsel, interposed with an oath: that by
two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie,
we (the elect ones) may have strong encouragement, who have fled for
refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us.”
(Heb.6:13-15,17 and 18)
aaron-Here again, we see the
prophetic Church in full view when God was making His promise to
father Abraham. God's original desire was to show us (the members
of His universal Congregation) the unchanging nature of His counsel.
That the members of His invisible Congregation, who are the
joint-heirs of the promise, may have strong encouragement in
this hope that is now set before us.
“Now to Abraham were the
promises spoken, and to his seed. He did not say: And to seeds, as
of many, but as of One: And to your seed, which is Christ. A
Covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law (the Old Covenant),
which came four hundred and thirty years after, (the Covenant made
with Abraham), does not annul, so as to make the promise of no
effect. For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no more of
promise. But God granted it to Abraham by promise.” (Gal.3:16-18)
aaron-The Abrahamic Covenant
of Grace always has complete preeminence over the law.
“(Again): For not through
the law was the promise to Abraham, but through the righteousness of
faith. For if they that are of the law are heirs, faith is made
void, and the promise is made ineffective.” (Rom.4:13 and 14)
“By the works of the law,
shall no flesh be justified in His sight.” (Rom.3:20a; Ref.
Gal.2:16; 3:11; and Ps.143:2)
aaron-This New Covenant
(Testament) has been in full effect since the last Passover supper,
where it was introduced to the world by our Lord. The New Testament
is God's institutional instructions to the Christian Church for
manifesting this final dispensation: The dispensation of God's
unfavored grace toward all peoples. God has, in fulfillment of His
promise to Abraham, opened wide the door of salvation to all the
nations of the entire earth. "All in Christ"
When we read “For if they
that are of the law are heirs, faith is made void, and the promise
is made ineffective”, and “By the works of the law, shall no flesh
be justified in His sight”, we should be constrained only to see the
Law as becoming completely subordinate to God’s free and unmerited
grace. Whether you are of the Circumcision, the Uncircumcision, or
the Baptism, you are saved by God’s GRACE! Whether you keep the
many feasts or not, you are still saved only by God’s GRACE!
“Now a mediator is not a
mediator of one, but God is one. Is the law than against the
promise of God? God forbid! For if there had been a law given
which could make alive, truly, righteousness would have been of the
law. But the Scriptures shut up all things under sin, that
the promise by the faith of Jesus Christ might be given to (all)
them that believe.” (Gal.3:20-22)
aaron-This promise is
intended for all Jews and all non-Jews alike. This
passage is also a conformation for the universal determination made
in Rom.11:32. There is no law that can make alive. The law reveals
sin. [a] The law condemns. [b] Grace forgives.
The Everlasting Covenant is
confirmed to the Church
“Even us (the members of
the invisible Congregation), whom He (God) also called. Not from the
Jews only, but also from the Nations. As He said in
Hosea: I will call them My people who were not My people, and her
beloved, who was not beloved. And it shall come to pass in the
place where it was said unto them: You are not My people, there will
they be called (children /or sons) of the Living God.”
(Rom.9:24-26; Ref. Hos.2:23 and 1:10)
aaron-This Scripture is
being fulfilled right now, just as it has been throughout the entire
Christian era.
“(Remember, it is) God who
gives life to the dead, and calls the things that are not as though
they were.” (Rom.4:17)
“(Remember also that) God
has shut up all unto disobedience, that He might have mercy
upon all.” (Rom.11:32)
“(Remember that you) who in
time past were no people, but now are (you) the people of God.
(1Pe.2:10)
aaron-Remember that, through
the law, all the world is brought under God's judgment: But
through the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, all the world is
brought to God's grace. I do not believe in “UNIVERSALISM” as such,
but I do believe in a form of “COVENANTAL UNIVERSALISM”. If you are
a part of the Covenants that God made with Abraham by your
association within God’s established institutions, then you are
saved by God’s free and unmerited grace through Christ’s finished
propitiatory work upon the cross. <**>
(“Remember), this is the
Covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord:
I will put My law on their hearts, and upon their minds also will I
write them. Then He says: And their sins and iniquities will I
remember no more.” (Heb.10:16,17/Jer.31:33)
“(Remember that) the Holy
Spirit bears witness.” (Heb.10:15)
“(Remember), that a death
having taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that
were under the First Covenant (VISIBLE ISRAEL); and they
(THOSE OF THE NATIONS) that have been called, may receive the
promise of the eternal inheritance.” (Heb.9:15b)
“(Remember), this is the
everlasting life, that they should know You, the only True God, and
Jesus Christ whom You have sent.” (Jn.17:3)
Covenant of Reconciliation
aaron-During the time of the
Old Covenant, God, as a demonstration of the relationship that He
desired to have with His whole creation, was dealing only with a
select group of peoples—the institution of the visible nations of
Israel: Guiding them and establishing them as examples for us
today. God, knowing that our nature is earthly, instructs us,
because His desired purpose for us is Spiritual and heavenly.
Jesus, according to promise, came into the world as the fulfillment
of God's Covenant with our father Abraham.
This Second Covenant is a
Covenant of Reconciliation, which is clearly seen when we take the
Scriptures at their face value. Literally
“(Again): That Jesus might
create in Himself of the two (Jews and Gentiles), one new man, so
making peace, and might reconcile them both (Jews and Gentiles) in
one body unto God through the cross.”
Eph.2:para.
“For if, while we were
enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son,
much more, being reconciled, shall we be saved in His life. We also
rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have
now received the reconciliation.” (Rom.5:10-11)
“For it was the good
pleasure of God that in Jesus should all the fullness dwell, and
through Him, to reconcile all things unto Himself, having made peace
through the blood of the cross. I say, whether things upon the
earth, or things in the heavens. And you, being in time past
alienated and enemies in your mind and in your evil works, yet now
has He reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present
you holy and without blemish and unreprovable before Him.”
(Col.1:19-22)
aaron-ALL SALVATION
throughout all time IS BY GRACE, GRACE, WONDERFUL GRACE!!! We must
not loose sight of fact that God has always dealt with His creation
on the basis of HIS GRACE alone—Gen.17:1-27, and all of this grace
freely flows out through Christ’s finished propitiation upon the
cross.
“But we again rejoice in God
through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received the
reconciliation.”
“Wherefore, if any man is in
Christ, he is a new creation. Old things are passed away, behold,
they are become new. But all things are of God, who reconciled us
to Himself through Christ, and gave unto us the ministry of
reconciliation: That is, that God was in Christ reconciling the
world unto Himself, not accounting unto them their trespasses,
and having committed unto us the word of reconciliation.”
(2Cor.5:17-20; Ref.Rom.4:7 and 8)
aaron-Once again, ALL
SALVATION IS BY GRACE, GRACE, WONDERFUL GRACE!!!
Why the Second Covenant was
necessary
“For what the law could not
do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God, sending His own Son
in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, condemned sin in the
flesh.” (Rom.8:3)
aaron-Jesus, through His
finished propitiatory work upon the cross, has allowed us free
access in spite of the condemnation against us in the Law.
“For there is an annulling
of the foregoing commandments because of its weakness and
unprofitableness.” (For the law made nothing perfect.)
(Heb.7:18 and 19a)
aaron-This is precisely what
I was referring to when I said that Christ’s finished propitiatory
work had to supply all of the efficacy for the Old Testament
sacrifices. It is a fact that the Old Testament sacrifices, like
Circumcision and like Baptism now, did not and does not convey any
efficacy at all through the act itself. Their entire efficacy, in
both the Old Testament and the New Testament dispensations, flows
out to God’s obedient Covenant peoples only from the finished
propitiatory work of Christ upon the cross. <**>
“(For) the law, having a
shadow of the good things to come, not the very image of the things,
can never with the same sacrifices year by year, which they offer
continually, make perfect them that draw near.” (Heb.10:1)
“According to that which is
offered both gifts and sacrifices that cannot, as touching the
conscience, make the worshipper perfect.” (Heb.9:9)
aaron-Christ’s propitiation
validates all of the “gifts and sacrifices” that were offered under
the old economy, yet all of our perfection comes only through the
perfect sacrifice that was made by our Lord Jesus.
aaron-Some in the Church
postulate the reinstitution of the Old Covenant during a supposed
millennial reign of Christ. This interpretation is nothing more
than vague speculation. The Old Covenant (the law) was in a sense
set aside because of its weakness and unprofitableness. The Old
Covenant was only a copy of the heavenly things: Some of the things
we may find in the eternal kingdom. Just as all of the Old
Testament sacrifices for sin were given as a picture of the coming
Eternal Sacrifice—the sacrificial Lamb of God the takes away the
sins of the world.
Only two Covenants: Law and
Grace
“For if the First Covenant
had been faultless, then would no place have been sought for a
Second.” (Heb.8:7)
“Then has He (Jesus) said,
lo, I am come to do Your will. He (Jesus) takes away the First,
that He (Jesus) may establish the Second.” (Heb.10:9)
“Israel's minds were
hardened, for until this very day, at the reading of the Old
Covenant, the same veil remains, it not being revealed unto them,
that it (the blinding veil) is done away in Christ.” (2Cor.3:14;
Ref.Rom.11:7-10; 9:30-33; Ps.69:22, 23; Isa.6:9; 1Pe.1:1-13; 2:8;
Acts.28:25-28)
“(In finding fault with the
First Covenant), He said: Behold, the day is coming says the Lord,
that I will make a New Covenant with the house of Israel and with
the house of Judah. Not according to the Covenant I made with their
fathers in the day that I took them out of the land of Egypt. For
they continued not in My Covenant. (Heb.8:8 and 9/ Jer.31:31 and 32)
aaron-We can clearly see the
two Covenants pictured in the two major divisions of the Bible: The
Old Covenant was the covenant of the law, and the New Covenant is
indeed the manifested Covenant of Grace. Covenant and Testament are
identical Greek words.
The New Covenant was given
to Israel first
aaron-This section is
inserted because of the Premill/Pretrib’s forced interpretation of
Acts.15:14-16. They imply by their interpretation, that God first
visited the Gentiles. This speculation is absolutely wrong! The
gospel, the good news, the Word, by decree, went to the visible Jews
[visible Israel] first.
“Unto you first, God,
having raised up His Servant (Jesus), sent Him to bless you, in
turning away every one of you from your iniquities.” (Acts.3:26)
“It was necessary that the
word of God should first be spoken to you: Seeing that you
thrust it (away), and judge yourselves unworthy to eternal life.
Lo, we turn to the Gentiles.” (Acts.13:46)
aaron-It would seem that the
“eternal life” spoken of here is “eternal life” in its most
definitive sense. That is, this “eternal life” is referring to that
“zao” life of Jn.5:25 that commences even while the recipient is
still physically alive. The individual soul is infused with
“eternal life”. Ref.1Pe.1:3-23 It is this Jn.3:3 “born again”
experience that instantaneously brings every elect individual into
this elevated supernatural state. <**>
“Salvation is from the
Jews.” (Jn.4:22)
“(Jesus' instructions to the
disciples): These twelve Jesus sent forth, and charged them, saying:
Go not into any way of the Gentiles, and enter not into any city of
the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of
Israel.” (Mat.10:5 and 6)
“Jesus was sent to the lost
sheep of Israel.” (Mat.15:24)
“They therefore that were
scattered abroad upon the tribulation that arose about Stephen,
traveled as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch, speaking the word
to none except only to Jews.” (Acts.11:19)
“For I am not ashamed of the
gospel, for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that
believes, to the Jews first, and also to the Greeks (and
Gentiles).” (Rom.1:16)
NOW WITHIN GOD’S REVEALED
INVISIBLE KINGDOM, ALL DISTINCTION BETWEEN VISIBLE JEWS, GENTILES,
GREEKS, BARBARIANS, VISIBLE CIRCUMCISION, AND UNCIRCUMCISION, IS
ETERNALLY REMOVED
“(Because) God is the God of
the Jews and the Gentiles.” (Rom.3:29)
“(Now) there is no
distinction, for all have sinned, and fall short of the glory of
God.” (Rom.3:22 and 23)
“Charge both Jews and
Greeks, that they are all under sin. There is none
righteous.” (Rom.3:9)
“The Scriptures (have) shut
up all things under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus
Christ might be given to (all) them that believe.” (Gal.3:22)
Then
within God’s invisible elect kingdom-
“There cannot be Greek and
Jew, Circumcision and Uncircumcision, bond or free, but Christ is
all, and in all.” (Col.3:11)
“There is no distinction
between Jews and Greeks, for the same Lord is Lord of all.”
(Rom.10:12)
“For in one Spirit were we
all baptized into one body, whether Jew or Greek, whether
bond or free.” (1Cor.12:13)
aaron-Those within the
Church who continue to promote this distinction between the Jews,
the Gentiles, Israel, and the Church, will generally agree—that
within the Church, all distinction has been removed. But they would
also say that when this dispensation ends, the distinction that they
promote will once again be evident. This condition is necessary in
their theology because of their speculated seventh dispensation, and
is, in my opinion, completely erroneous.
Question 2.
What did Abraham really represent?
Answer 2. God established
Abraham as the father of all of the nations. Abraham was to be the
prime example of God's relationship with His creation.
a. Abraham was called a
friend of God.
b. God's relationship with
Abraham was one of many steps that He has taken throughout the
ages. This was carefully done for the strict purpose of manifesting
Himself to His whole creation.
Question 3.
(a) What did the term JEW
represent?
(b) Does the term JEW
have any application in the New Testament Church?
Answer 3
(a) JEW was the
designation that God gave to the peoples that He has, through time
and eternity, chosen to Himself.
(b) Yes! JEW
continues to this day to be the complex designation for both God's
visible and invisible peoples.
TO BECOME PART OF GOD'S
MANIFESTED INVISIBLE FAMILY AND KINGDOM
YOU MUST BECOME A JEW
“For he is not a Jew who is
one outwardly, neither is that Circumcision which is outward in the
flesh, but he a Jew who is one inwardly.”
aaron-It is only
God’s internal dispositions that make this hidden determination that
qualifies that individual to become a participant in God’s hidden
Kingdom.
Question 4.
(a) What is the exact
reasoning behind CIRCUMCISION?
(b) Does the term
Circumcision have application within the New Testament Church?
Answer 4
(a) Visible CIRCUMCISION
is the designation for a required initiation that was mandated for
every male in Abraham’s household, and thereafter—every
eight-day-old male child was to be circumcised: Like Jesus was
circumcised on the eight day of His earthly existence.
Then to be elected into the
invisible priesthood of God and His hidden Kingdom, each and every
individual must be CIRCUMCISED by God Himself: they must have
received that blessed Circumcision of Christ—the Circumcision of the
Heart.
(b) Yes!
Special note: Physical
circumcision, besides being one of God’s visible initiatory rites
into His established visible institution called Israel, physical
circumcision was also a visible example of an invisible condition
that God had established as the required symbol for His invisible
Messianic Covenant line: A physical example of a Spiritual
condition. We then understand that this same principle applies all
the way back into the Old Covenant—even back to the Garden of Eden
when God, because of Adam’s disobedience, removed Paradise from the
visible realm and placed it in the invisible realm of the
supernatural. Yes, even during the time of the Old Covenant
dispensation, God was also selectively applying this invisible
Circumcision of the heart to His elect priesthood.
aaron-The members of the
invisible Congregation—the hidden Israel of God—the invisible Church
of God are:
(1) At peace with God,
standing in His grace.
(2) Children of the
promise. And/
(3) Abraham's seed, heirs
according to promise.
“I say that Christ has been
made a minister of the Circumcision for the truth of God: That He
might confirm the promises given to the fathers, and that the
Gentiles might glorify God for His mercy. As it is written:
Therefore, will I give praise unto You among the nations, and
sing unto Your name; Rejoice, you nations with His people.
Praise the Lord, all you nations, and let all peoples
praise Him. Isaiah (also) says: There shall be a Root of Jesse, and
He that arises to rule over the nations, on Him shall the nations
hope.” (Rom.15:8-12; Ref.2Sam.22:50; Ps.18:40;117:1; Isa.11:10)
aaron-When the Scriptures
say, “as it is written”: they are pointing to a prophetic
conformation or fulfillment of an Old Testament Scriptural event.
Isa.42:1/Mat.12:18—“Behold My servant, whom I uphold, My Chosen, in
whom My soul delights: I have put My Spirit upon Him, He will bring
forth justice to the nations.”
aaron-We have seen
God, within these Scriptures, making His Covenant with Abraham and
his seed. It is very clear, that God, even at that early time,
fully intended to include all of earth’s Nations in His Covenant.
Not exclusive, but
all-inclusive.
“[Remember]: For this cause
it is of faith, that it may be according to grace, to the end, that
the promise may be sure to all the seed. Not to that only which is
of the law (visible Israel), but to that also which is of the faith
of Abraham, who is the father of us all. As it is written: A
father of many nations have I made you. Before him whom he
believed, even God, who gives life to the dead (visible Israel), and
calls the things that are not (the Gentiles) as if they were. Who
in hope believed against hope, to the end, that he might be the
father of many nations.” Romans 4:
aaron-This is that leveling
process that we have discussed in other places. Our Covenant
relationship to Abraham gives us a legal share with those who are of
the Law, and also places the visible Church on equal footing with
visible Israel. The institutions of visible Israel and the visible
Christian Church are both God established institutions, through
which, by the use of God’s commanded initiatory rites (Circumcision
and Baptism), the visible creation has access to their invisible
Creator.
TO BECOME
PART OF GOD'S REVEALED INVISIBLE PRIESTHOOD AND HIDDEN KINGDOM,
YOU MUST
BECOME THE CIRCUMCISION
“And the Circumcision
that God requires is that Circumcision of the heart, in
the Spirit, not in the letter.” (Rom.2:28 and 29)
aaron-To be a part of the
invisible elect, God reminds us that the physical dispositions of
man have no significance towards our entering into God’s invisible
Kingdom. As these passages now show us:
"neither is that
circumcision which is outward in the flesh" Rom.2:28b
aaron-The only circumcision
that has any value within God’s invisible Kingdom, is the
Circumcision of the heart.
"Circumcision is nothing,
and Uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments
of God." 1Cor.7:19
Then God continues to define
the invisible Circumcision even further:
"you were also Circumcised
with a Circumcision not made with hands,
in putting off the body of the flesh, in the Circumcision of
Christ." (Col.2:11)
"For we are the
Circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God, and glory in
Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.” (Phil.3:3, Ref.
Lev.26:41, Deut.30:6, Jer.4:4, and 9:26)
Question 5.
(a) What did the designation
ISRAEL represent?
(b) Does the term ISRAEL
have any application within the New Testament Church?
Answer 5
(a) ISRAEL
represented the corporate name assigned to both the visible and the
invisible peoples of God.
(b) Yes! The corporate name
of the peoples of God has never changed. It was ISRAEL in
the Old Testament time, as it is still ISRAEL in this New
Testament time. Although Israel has a complex definition, we must
understand the visible and the invisible characteristics of this
title are always coexistent, and that these internal dispositions
are the required qualifications for any participation in God’s
hidden royal priesthood.
TO BECOME
PART OF GOD'S REVEALED INVISIBLE FAMILY AND HIS HIDDEN KINGDOM
YOU MUST
BECOME PART OF ISRAEL
“The word of God has not
come to nothing, for they are not all Israel that are of Israel.
Neither, because they are Abraham's seed are they all children. But
in Isaac shall your seed be called. That is, it is not
the children of the flesh that are the children of God,
but the children of the promise are counted for a seed. (Rom.9:6-8;
8:14-17; 11:25-32) Gal.6:16—“The Israel of God.”
aaron-This is making a sharp
distinction between the visible and the invisible—the “children of
the flesh” in distinction to the “children of God”. Since we have
had more than sufficient dialog on this complex definition of
ISRAEL in our ARGUMENT section, we will not go any further than
the Scriptures themselves at this time.
FINALLY,
TO BECOME PART OF GOD'S REVEALED INVISIBLE FAMILY AND HIS HIDDEN
KINGDOM
YOU MUST
BECOME PART OF ISRAEL'S OLIVE TREE
“I say then, did Israel
stumble that they might fall? God forbid! But by their fall,
salvation has come unto the Gentiles to provoke them to jealousy.
Now if their fall is the riches of the world, and their loss
the riches of the Nations, how much more their fullness? For if the
casting away of them is the reconciling of the world, what shall the
receiving of them be, but life from the dead? And if the
First-fruit is holy, so is the lump. And if the Root is holy, so
are the branches. But if some of the branches were broken off, and
you, being wild olive (branches) were grafted in among them,
and did become partakers with them of the Root and the
fatness of the Olive Tree. (Rom.11:11-12, and 15-17)
aaron-Here, we see only one
Olive Tree in view, the Natural Tree: and we also see the Gentiles
being described as wild olive branches that are being grafted in
among the natural branches. This whole Olive Tree is to
represent Historic Israel—the hidden Israel of God.
“You will say then, the
branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in. Well,
because of their unbelief they were broken off, and you are
standing by faith. Be not high-minded, but fear. For if God spared
not the natural branches, neither will He spare you. Behold then the
goodness and severity of God. Toward them that fell severity, but
toward you, God's goodness, if you continue in His goodness,
otherwise you also shall be cut out. And they (visible
Israel /or the broken branches) also, if they continue not in
unbelief, shall be grafted in. For God is able to graft them in
again. Into the Natural Olive Tree.” (Rom.11:19-24)
aaron-We must conclude by
these Scriptures, that we are all positioned as broken branches.
Whether Jew or Gentile, we must all be grafted into the one and only
Olive Tree, Israel's Olive Tree, the Natural Olive Tree, Jesus. To
become a part of God’s hidden Israel, you must be grafted into
Israel’s olive tree and be specifically known by the royal titles of
ISRAEL, THE CIRCUMCISION, AND A JEW.
The New
Covenant Congregation is a new work of God - The Manifested Gospel
aaron-God has allowed us to
understand the authenticity and complexity of all of these terms
that we have been discussing: JEW, CIRCUMCISION, and
ISRAEL. That is, understanding that an added reality for
these designations that God had set in place so long ago, has been
hidden in God throughout the generations. These are the enhanced
designations that must now be openly manifested in and through the
saints of Christ’s Church. These are manifested truths about
Old Testament realities: These represent the manifested invisible
dispositions that God’s visible dispositions were intended to
symbolize.
"The mystery which has been
hid for ages and generations: but now has it been manifested to His
saints," Col.1:26
"To make all men see what is
the dispensation of the mystery which for ages has been hid in God
who created all things;" Eph.3:9
Isa.42:6 speaks of Jesus:
Where Jehovah gives Jesus for a Covenant of the people and for a
Light unto the Gentiles. v.9 speaks of these things—“Behold, the
former things are come to pass, and new things do I declare: Before
they spring forth, I tell you of them.”
aaron-The good news is the
fact that God had always intended to expand His salvation program so
as to incorporate the Jews and the non-Jews alike. This action on
the part of God would appear as a new thing to any First
Century casual observer, and it is actually defined the same in the
Scriptures. But this new thing is, in all actuality, only
the full manifestation and explanation of the fulfillment of God's
master plan. I am convinced that all of these things were ordered
from the very beginning, and were an integral part of our discovery
concerning the complexities of the Abrahamic Covenant.
Gal.6:15 calls it a new
creature, speaking of the combining of the elect Circumcision and
the elect Uncircumcision into the single designation of
CIRCUMCISION—the invisible Circumcision of the heart. "For neither
is circumcision anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature."
aaron- God, within this
passage, is simply explaining the eternal value of the
aforementioned physical attributes: That neither circumcision nor
uncircumcision has any appreciable value toward our achieving the
invisible Kingdom of God. The new creature that is mentioned
here is not completely new within God’s order of things, but it is
only new to our current understanding. What we mean, is that this “new
creature” was always there from the very beginning, hidden in
God. Before the Gospel revelation, that is, before grace came to
us, it was not fully manifested to the understanding of God’s
peoples—as we were previously kept under the law—ignorant of these
Spiritual revelations.
Eph.2:15 speaks of the same
unity in the body, and calls it one new man created in Christ
Jesus. "For He is our peace, who made both (the elect Circumcision
and the elect Uncircumcision) one, and broke down the middle wall of
partition, having abolished in His flesh the enmity, even the law of
commandment contained in ordinances; that He might create in Himself
of the two (the elect Jews and the elect Gentiles) ONE NEW MAN, so
making peace; and might reconcile them both (the elect Circumcision
and the elect Uncircumcision) in ONE BODY unto God through the
cross, having slain the enmity thereby:" Eph.2:14-16
aaron-We can understand by
this passage, that God has now removed all of the road blocks that
had previously stopped the Nations from coming into any covenant
relationship with Himself. There was a middle wall of partition
that created an enmity, and there were ordinances that
enforced that partition of separation. What makes this so
difficult, is the fact that these principles have been, in one
sense, removed: That is, that the way into the Kingdom has now been
opened for all. Yet, in another sense, some of these same
principles continue to be enforced: That is, God still requires His
peoples to separate themselves from the works of darkness—"Come out
from among them and be separate, say the Lord.” 2Cor.6:17 This
subtle change here in the meaning, is what we are trying to
communicate in these writings. Yes, the nations of visible Israel;
the visible Jews and the visible Circumcision, are the original
peoples of God. But in this present economy of grace, that initial
hereditary limitation or restriction for accessing God’s covenants
is no longer the case.
For our sakes, in the grand
scheme of things, physical Israel, the physical Jews, and the
physical Circumcision, have been given the alien designation of
UNCIRCUMCISION. They have now been put on an absolute level with
the Gentiles (the Nations). Yet under this economy of grace, the
Christian Church continues to be confused because God's chosen
peoples that constitute His hidden priesthood are still known by the
corporate name of Israel—the hidden Israel of God. Then this
elect hidden Israel of God is made up entirely of
Jews—invisible Jews and the Circumcision—the invisible
Circumcision. As this is also confirmed in Eph.4:22-24, and
Col.3:10 and 11. Consequently, some confusion here is
understandable.
1Cor.5:7 calls those of the
body a new lump, even as we are unleavened. "Purge out the old
leaven, that you may be A NEW LUMP, even as you are unleavened. For
our Passover also has been sacrificed, even CHRIST."
aaron-Interestingly, the
Apostle Paul uses an Old Testament reference in order to connect the
New Testament Christian Church to the Old Testament peoples of God.
“For our Passover also has been sacrificed, even CHRIST” confirms
the interconnection between the Old Testament Law and the New
Testament Grace.
aaron-In review:
There continues to be much opposition to the institutional Church in
the world today. Many denominations disregard the commands of God
in order to promote their own theological understandings. This, my
brothers and sisters, is to our shame. Through many Scriptures, the
Lord has spoken to us concerning our love of God and our love of the
brethren. But there can never be unity in the body of Christ, the
Church, so long as we continue to disagree about the identification
of God's peoples: The nations of Israel, the Jews, the saints in the
Church. Does God make distinction between His peoples? We know
those in the Congregation who would make that distinction between
Israel and the Church: Supposing that God will deal with Israel in a
future time and in different ways. And we also know, that if we
were to look at Israel just through the Old Testament, there is
little doubt in those conclusions we might reach. We will see a
peoples, chosen by God and separated from the other nations. But
when we read the New Testament, this distinction and separation
completely disappears from God's program of reconciliation. The New
Covenant established by our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, is to be
the consummation of God's eternal program. Jesus is that promised
community salvation—that this is a truth for all of God’s peoples,
“for while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us”. My brothers
and sisters, unity in the body of Christ, the Church, is not
optional, it is a command of God—Enacted on better promises.
FOR THE CHILD OF GOD,
TO BE PART OF GOD'S REVEALED
INVISIBLE FAMILY
1. They must become a
Jew—a Jew on the inside, because this is the only Jew that God
will accept into His invisible priestly line.
2. They must also
become the Circumcision, with the Circumcision not made with
hands—the Circumcision of the Heart.
3. They must become part
of Israel, and only the children of the promise are counted for
a seed; part of the Israel of God.
4. They must
become as the natural branches in this Blessed Trunk—for they all
must become part of the Natural Olive Tree.
With these facts in view,
how can we distinguish between the members of the invisible
Christian Church and the invisible Israel of God? We cannot because
they are all one body!
"But as many as received
Him, to them gave He the right to become children of God, even to
them that believe on His name: who were born, not of blood,
nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man,
but of God." (Jn.1:12 and 13, Ref. Phil.2:15, and 1Jn.3:1 and
2)
aaron-This need to
distinguish between the institutions of the Church and Israel is the
result of a larger problem: Pride and the inability to accept the
Scriptures at face value.
As we establish our
interpretation of the Scriptures, we must not allow our
understanding to dictate that interpretation. This condition is
evident in the theology of those who would futurize eschatology.
The teaching of a future enactment of the New Covenant, the Covenant
of Promise, is without any sound New Testament support. Dr.
Scofield should have given more adherence to his own advice: “Never
use a doubtful or obscure passage to contradict a clear and positive
one.” Rightly Dividing The Word Of Truth p.64.
THE TWO
COVENANTS
(Extensions of the
Everlasting Covenant)
OLD
(Covenants/Testaments) NEW
First
Covenant
Second Covenant
Visible/Invisible
Israel
Church/Invisible Israel
Visible/Invisible
Jew
Church/Invisible Jew
Visible/Invisible
Circumcision Church/Invisible-
-Circumcision
(Ex.19:5,6)
(1Pe.2:9,10)
God's own
possession God's own
possession
A holy
nation
A holy nation
A kingdom of
priests A kingdom
of priests
Part of the Olive
Tree Part of the Olive Tree
Natural olive
branches Natural/Wild olive branches
The household of
God " "
Children of
promise
" "
Fellow-citizens
" "
Sons of
Abraham
" "
Members of the
body
" "
Sheep Sheep/Another
sheep
Fellow
heirs
" "
Children of God
" "
See -
www.the-abrahamic-covenant.info
AARON-SPECIAL NOTE:
CHAPTER FIVE
"A REVIEW OF JUSTIFICATION AND CONDEMNATION",
CHAPTER SIX
"SIN AND US - JEWS AND GENTILES",
CHAPTER SEVEN
"THE LAW AND US - JEWS AND GENTILES",
and
CHAPTER EIGHT
"THE SPIRIT AND US - JEWS AND GENTILES"
all serve to thoroughly
enlighten us on the Christian's walk and God’s sure promises for the
future hope that awaits visible Israel as well as the whole of God’s
visible corporate peoples. But in order for us to more easily
explore the eschatology of Romans, it will be helpful
at this time for us to by-pass these middle chapters and complete
this study by critically examining chapters nine through eleven.
|